February 23, 2006
Hank III: On the Highway to Hell
Posted by Sean Moores at February 23, 2006 1:27 AMStraight to Hell
Hank Williams III
(Curb Records)
Release date: Feb. 28
Hank III rocks harder, and just might raise more hell, than the other members of the Holy Trinity of Hank, which also comprises granddaddy Hank Williams and daddy Hank Jr. In case you didn't come to that conclusion on your own by looking at the ponytail poking out from under his battered cowboy hat or his tat sleeves or the blood-stained cover of this album, Hank III will be sure to remind you. His edgy take on the eldest Hank's music, a brand of hard country he calls "hellbilly," is a breath of fresh air. His posturing and preaching to the choir on his latest release, the double-disc "Straight to Hell," are a breath of hot air.
It's not that Hank III made a bad album, despite the numerous delays before its release. Much to the contrary. Mainstream country leaves a bad taste in a lot of mouths, so it's nice to have an alternative to the supposedly alternative but fairly manufactured outlaw image and buffoonery of acts such as Big & Rich. It's just that Hank III feels the need to remind us how bad-ass and anti-establishment he is. If you've bought his other CDs, you know. If this is your first Hank III experience, reading the song titles probably will give you an idea what he wants you to know:
Hank is a sinner, and he's going straight to hell ("Straight to Hell").
Hank likes to take pills ("Pills I Took").
Hank likes weed and wine, probably Thunderbird ("Smoke & Wine").
Hank is a crazed country rebel ("Crazed Country Rebel").
He's also a name-dropper. It's a habit he probably picked up from the even more self-aggrandizing Hank Jr. despite their bumpy past. I don't want to say their relationship is strained, but let's just say they aren't exactly going to be participating in the three-legged race at the Father and Son Outlaw Picnic. In "Country Heroes," Hank III endorses George Jones, David Allan Coe, Merle Haggard, Waylon Jennings, Hank Williams and Johnny Cash. Gee, 3, thanks for the tip.
The tunes are good. They've got a beat; you can dance to them (if you were so inclined). Lyrically, though, Hank III is cutting a few corners. Exhibit A is the chorus from "Dick in Dixie": "I'm here to put the dick in dixie / and the cunt back in country / because the kind of country I'm hearing nowadays is a bunch of fuckin' shit to me." It's not only lazy writing, but it's not news to anybody who's picking up Hank III's albums. Does he really think he's going to get the satisfaction of pissing off Keith Urban fans who bought his disc, too?
In case you don't think he's tough enough, Hank III even takes a page from the hip-hop book and calls out a rival: "Just so you know so it's set in stone / Kid Rock don't come from where I come from / yeah it's true he's a Yank, he ain't no son of Hank / and if you thought so goddamn you're fuckin' dumb." For a guy who doesn't get along with his daddy, he's awful jealous of a Detroit rapper working with him.
HickoryWind's Stacy Chandler summed up these rough edges perfectly after a Hank III show in D.C. by saying (though I'm paraphrasing) that he's like a kid who learns how to cuss; he just keeps cussin' and cussin' because he can, instead of using it sparingly for effect. (She went on to add that Steve Earle knew how to curse with class, but I suppose that topic is best saved for another day.)
Despite the shortage of social graces, Hank III makes some undeniably good country music. As already mentioned, whether or not you think the lyrics are all they could be, the tunes will make you tap your foot and more than likely sing along. "Thrown Out of the Bar" is two minutes of hell-raisin' fun. The Disc 1 closer, "Angel of Sin," is a pretty ballad. The Disc 2 opener, the Cash-like "Louisiana Stripes," also is a keeper.
Then there's the rest of Disc 2, actually a hidden track that exposes another side of Hank III – the artiste. It's not a song. It's a 42-minute collage/fever dream that incorporates a handful of songs including a cover of granddaddy's "I Could Never Be Ashamed of You." It also contains a chugging locomotive, a babbling brook, a babbling preacher, laughing children, vaguely (OK, explicitly) demonic voices and pig grunts, not necessarily in that order.
So what does it all mean? Is it just a bunch of stuff strung together, or is it meant to represent something more? Perhaps that descent straight into hell. That's just one idea, but it's open to interpretation, like that freaky island on "Lost." It is an impressive statement, though. Given Hank III's history of fighting with his record label, the track suggests that perhaps they should be more willing to let him off the leash.
Yeah Hank, quitcher bitchin.
A song that complains about bad songs is NOT the same as a good song. "Nashville sucks, blah blah blah": it's about as trenchant a social statement as a skull tattoo.
He's pandering to a specific market, which is no less cynical in its way than Toby Keith's "The Angry Cracker" or that "Honky Tonk Badonkadonk," and possibly more embarrassing. Pop psychology and a little history of his father-son relationships tell us what 3 is really raging about.
That said, I thought the first two records were great fun and I'll probably pick this one up out of the bargain bin in a couple of months.
Posted by: B. Earnest at February 23, 2006 8:42 AMI'm noticing a pattern among the Hank lineage. Since we're in agreement that they all shared an equal taste for the wilder side, that doesn't need to be rehashed (no pun intended). From a talent standpoint, though, its a different story. Hank (the original) was undeniably a fantastic songwriter and performer. The songs that he wrote and recorded during his short life are true works of art that transcend all forms of music.
While Jr. never reached this - transcendence - he did have a good run at it. For much of the 70s and early 80s he ruled the airwaves with his own brand of outlaw poetry - some of which still holds up today (Family Tradition & Whiskey Bent, for example). It wasn't until the late 80s that his well ran dry and the self-aggrandizing belligerence began...and it wasn't pretty.
Now to Hank III, apparently he missed the songwriting talent-boat altogether in favor for the SS Belligerent Redneck. What a shame though, songwriting inabilities aside, he really has a good voice.
Posted by: James at February 23, 2006 9:32 AMNo matter what your lineage, using obscenities as a crutch just knocks the slats out of even a mediocre song. They're a cheap trick. Hank Sr rocked the world with nary an "F" word, because he knew how to write.
Guess the bar was too high.
Posted by: Jim Pipkin at February 23, 2006 9:00 PMWith respect, all the comments thus far seem rather elitist - which is funny in the context of discussing an offshoot of hillbilly music, though that's neither here nor there.
Granted, his lyrics aren't the greatest, but then I could argue that of most anything coming out of Nashville. To this end, his are on par or better - though clearly of a different bent. If his swearing is gratuitous, it's not the only gratuitous thing out there - and certainly isn't worth analyzing. Maybe he needs an American Pride song to get some respect in this crowd?
In any case, for someone living under the double-jeopardy shadow of the runestone of country music and the cartoon character that his father became, I think he's done a good job of both carving out a unique niche for himself and finding an audience outside of that his family has long held.
Isn't it enough that it makes you tap your toes?
Posted by: Frank Swanson at March 4, 2006 3:55 PMI've had this CD for a few weeks now and I love it. I'll be honest and say that I have not done my research on the lyrics but the sounds and cover alone have kept me interested. This is a creepy album and refreshingly different than most that come across my desk. It's also my first sample of Hank III, so I also can't comment on how this relates in the big Hank III scheme of music. All I can say is for right now, I dig it's creepy ambience.
Hank III not for everyone. There are a lot, a LOT, of people out there that are fed up with the current state of music and the marketing of music, not just country music I might add. Hank sounds off for that group. He does it hard, loud, and does not make excuses. Exactly what is needed.
Posted by: jack at July 7, 2006 2:22 PMWhile I agree that Nashville is being corrupted and what not, IMO Hank III doesn't have to go about in in quite this way. Though I haven't heard this album yet, judging from the lyrics, I just might not listen to it. My main problem is the demonic-ness of the album. While I don't deny that the songs are toe-tapping good, I just feel that the profanities are unnecessary. The man's got a great voice and I think he could be using it for more Christian kind of things. Also, I think he should ditch the death metal stuff, too. Just my opinion.
Posted by: Cless at July 1, 2007 1:41 AMwho gives a good goddamn about the fucking cussing, if your virgin ears are to sensitive...dont listen. no for all the grown ups in the conversation i thought the cd was pretty fucking sweet, it shows his roots in hardcore/metal a hell of a lot more than the other two albums... and thats just fine by me. Oh and about the Christian and demonic bullshit. fuck you he doesn't have to answer to anyone because Hank III is a bad ass
Posted by: Blaine at December 27, 2007 12:03 AMHow bout you let Hank III be himself. Your sopposed to write songs about your life and ho youve felt, and well thats what hes doin. Just because hes not narrow minded about music and likes another kind that happens to be metal people dont like him. Hes the last hope for real country fans besides this Keith Urban, Kenny Chesney shit. They make southerns look like pussies. If you dont like it, dont listen.
Posted by: Cole at May 19, 2008 7:37 PMIII is standin up for what he believes. theres no doubt he could have sold out like everbody else and stood on stage and grinned like an idiot and hed probably be a lot richer too. i turn on a country station these days and it breaks my fuckin heart. im not even knocking the rascal fags, urban, and all the other sellouts. their music just needs to be moved to VH1 where it fuckin belongs. i dont even like all of 3's music but i respect him. Hank, u sir, are a true american.
Posted by: scott at May 22, 2008 2:54 PMDemonic?
Maybe, maybe not. That is what they said of Ozzy too. If you really licten to Ozzy's music however he is saying things like when the politicians die Satan laughs, spreads his wings and takes them away. I don't get why Christians are so afraid of talking about the devil didn't the "Bible" educate all of us about the devil anyway?
Isn't "Pop-Country" simply POP? should it really be called country? Why do they classify it as country? is it because there is a fiddle?
According to the definition:
Country music is a blend of popular musical forms originally found in the Southern United States and the Appalachian Mountains. It has roots in traditional folk music, Celtic music, blues, gospel music, hokum, and old-time music and evolved rapidly in the 1920s
Although I like the fact my daughters are finding impowering music in some of the newer pop-country style I still don't feel it is really country music. It no longer shows it's roots. When you have no roots you have no foundation.
Posted by: TN_Hillbilly at July 23, 2008 9:52 AMi couldnt even get through this whole article it is so fucking stupid. hank 3 doesnt get along with his dad? where the fuck do you dig this shit up from? there pictures and videos of him and his dad turkey hunting from like last year.
Posted by: Captain Mark at August 13, 2008 11:16 PM