March 5, 2008
Review: 'Vagabond' maybe should have stayed home
Posted by Stacy Chandler at March 5, 2008 4:17 PMGary Louris
Vagabonds
Rykodisc
Being a rabid, drooling Jayhawks fan, I looked forward to founding Jayhawks member Gary Louris' solo debut the way a junkie looks forward to his next fix. I needed it, if nothing else to try to ease the heartbreak of the latest Jayhawks breakup (even though I cling stubbornly to the belief that that breakup is as nonpermanent as all that have come before).
Getting to the point, "Vagabonds" was not the comforting embrace I needed. In fact, it pointed out anew the big gaping void the Jayhawks' departure (for now) has torn in my universe. For this junkie, the fix was all too fleeting, and it wasn't even really that fun.
"Vagabonds" shows Gary Louris as supreme dictator, though presumably a nice enough one, and sole songwriter. Free from the restraints of working with a band, and of having to uphold a certain sound, he lets his hair down. Metaphorically speaking, of course. There's plenty of electric guitar -- a leaning Louris first manifested on "Sound of Lies," arguably the least Jayhawksy Jayhawks album (though I'm in the minority that loves it). But the biggest break from the Way of Jayhawks is a lack of sung harmony, which is absolutely startling if you're coming to this album with a familiarity with Louris' former (maybe) band. But he has the pipes to stand alone, in theory.
In practice, however, getting through this album takes some work. To borrow a lyric from the opening song, you've got to "strip it down to what you can rescue." Because there are layers upon layers upon layers of ... layers to this thing. While the production, led by Chris Robinson -- yes, of the Black Crowes -- puts Louris' singing front and center, there's plenty of competition. Most notably from the a "choir" credited in the liner notes. And while it's a damn impressive roster of voices -- Robinson, Susanna Hoffs and Jenny Lewis, for examples -- the choir effect adds little, at best, to songs on which it's employed (almost every one). And at worst, it annoys me enough to prompt a lunge for the "next track" button.
I found myself hitting "next" quite a bit while listening to this album, actually. Most of the songs are good enough, but each feels too long by several minutes. And with the longest song on the album clocking in at about 5 1/2 minutes, and most more like 4 minutes, that's a serious problem. Many of the songs are repetitive, and, well, just plain boring. Even musical doo-dads like choral flourishes and a pedal steel and, ummm, hand claps don't punch through the blah. And the lyrics don't shine enough to save the day.
You could blame the production for a lot of this, but listening to "Acoustic Vagabonds," a bonus disc that comes with the album only at independent record stores, is only marginally better. The strummy treatment frames Louris' voice to better effect, I think, and grates less for lack of overwrought choral effects. But here the weakness of the lyrics becomes more apparent, and the songs get boring just as quickly.
Maybe it's unfair to approach "Vagabonds" in the context of the Jayhawks, but it's inevitable. And while the Jayhawks have broken my heart a million times with their breakups and lineup changes, they never, ever bored me. I think HW.org buddy Carlton sums it up best, as he often does: "If Mark Olson's latest album sounds like 50% of the Jayhawks, then this one sounds like the other 50% Neither half is quite as good as the whole."
I quite like the acoustic vagabonds. The regular album though......
Posted by: Patrickhayes at March 6, 2008 12:38 AMThere is a shiny rumor going around that 50% and the other 50% will be collaborating on a album due out later this year.
Posted by: Carlton Swift at March 6, 2008 10:35 AMThey recorded it before "Vagabonds" was recorded. Chris Robinson also produced that album..let's hope he had the good sense to leave those two voices by themselves.
Posted by: patrickhayes at March 9, 2008 1:49 PMI'm surprised you describe yourself as a "rabid, drooling Jayhawks fan" and I don't understand how you can honestly review an album if you are “lunging for the next track button.”
Any serious music fan knows that you cannot judge an album based on first impressions. Sometimes the beauty of an album reveals itself slowly.
‘Vagabonds’ is just such an album. The more you listen to it, the more you love it. It is the perfect length at 10 songs over 44 minutes. I don’t know if Louris himself or Chris Robinson is responsible for editing it down to this length but it is a definite improvement over Another Fine Day, Rainy Day Music, and Smile which were too long and lacked the cohesiveness that ‘Vagabonds’ has (knock a few song off of both AFD and RDM and they go from good to great, Smile is another matter entirely).
Another great idea was to offer some really good songs from these sessions that were left off the album as downloads on Amazon.com and iTunes. Doing that preserved the feel of the album and provided “rabid, drooling Jayhawks fans” more of that fix that they crave so badly. Along with that we get a stripped down, acoustic EP of six songs off the album to complete what I would say is exactly the right way to make and release an album.
If you truly love the Jayhawks then do yourself a favor and listen to this album 5 or 10 more times. I think you may be surprised at how much you’ll find yourself loving it and it just may become your favorite.
If you would like to sell your Acoustic Vagabonds cd-- I'd gladly take it off your hands...
Posted by: Heather at April 6, 2008 3:03 AMAn honest review of an honestly flawed recording. There are three very good songs here that would have been pace changers on a Jayhawks CD and alot of introspective filler that wouldn't have.
The failure, and the pretension, here is that stripping down his work to poetry and acoustic guitar somehow makes it more significant. What it does is make it about as adventurous as an AARP meeting.
Louris drank the Laurel Canyon cool aid. This is a CD for critics. Let the dozen or so of them spend their time and money on this dull muddle.
Posted by: DBokoski at May 4, 2008 9:09 PM